Taylor Swift’s Reps Reply to Backlash Towards Personal Jets

Rate this post

CLEVELAND, OHIO - OCTOBER 30: Taylor Swift performs onstage during the 36th Annual Rock & Roll Hall Of Fame Induction Ceremony at Rocket Mortgage Fieldhouse on October 30, 2021 in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo by Kevin Kane/Getty Images for The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame )

Taylor Swift got here beneath hearth when a advertising and marketing agency known as Yard printed a listing rating celebrities based mostly on their private-jet utilization in a July 29 report. Utilizing information from a Twitter account known as Celeb Jets that borrows insights from a reservoir of flight data known as ADS-B Trade, the outlet discovered that Swift had used her non-public jet greater than some other superstar in 2022, taking a complete of 170 flights up to now this yr. Per the examine, Swift’s aircraft spent 22,923 minutes within the air since January, with a mean flight time of 80 minutes, which is roughly 1,185 instances the variety of carbon emissions of a mean particular person.

Shortly after the listing was unveiled, Swift’s reps provided a proof for her seemingly excessive utilization. «Taylor’s jet is loaned out frequently to different people,» they stated in an announcement to At this time shared on July 30. «To attribute most or all of those journeys to her is blatantly incorrect.»

The entire private-jet dialogue started when Kylie Jenner was criticized for exhibiting off her and Travis Scott’s non-public jets on Instagram and taking a flight that reportedly lasted solely 17 minutes, per Celeb Jets. Followers rapidly accused her of «flexing her absolute disregard for the planet» on social media.

However the information quickly revealed that Jenner is much from the worst offender by way of private-jet emissions — that honor belongs to Swift by a landslide. Following her was Floyd Mayweather, then JAY-Z, A-Rod, and Blake Shelton. Steven Spielberg, Kim Kardashian, Mark Wahlberg, and Oprah Winfrey additionally made the listing. Jenner herself didn’t make the listing, although Scott did, rating tenth.

After all, people’ carbon footprints — even when extraordinarily giant — aren’t the primary drivers of the local weather disaster. That title belongs to fossil-fuel firms, the highest 100 of which produce over 71 % of world carbon emissions, that means that the outrage being projected at celebrities is perhaps higher directed in direction of these firms. Nevertheless, the extremely wealthy’s carbon emissions do make a distinction. A 2020 Oxfam report discovered that the richest one % of individuals on the earth alone produce twice as many carbon emissions because the poorest 50 % of individuals on Earth do all collectively. In the meantime, the individuals who produce the least carbon emissions face the worst results of local weather change general.

In brief, whereas fossil-fuel firms — not Jenner or Swift — are primarily in charge for the local weather disaster, it would not damage if the celebs left their jets on the bottom at times.


Por favor ingrese su comentario!
Por favor ingrese su nombre aquí